Share This Article
In India, the child surname is decided by the mother of the child. The child’s father is not allowed to have any direct contact with the child. Therefore, in most cases, the child is not even registered with his/her biological parents.
This law is pretty interesting since if the child was not registered with his biological mother, his father would be legally allowed to visit him. Now imagine if that same child’s father was arrested and found not guilty of murder or something. That would be a very interesting thing to happen since his father, who has not legally taken any of the childs side in his life, would have to be legally removed from the childs life. It seems like a very harsh and unfair practice.
This is one of those issues that has been mentioned in the media, but to be honest, no one really has anything to say about it. The main reason for the law is to prevent the childs biological father from being a “child rapist.” In India, a biological father can only visit his child once every year, whereas a father can visit his child twice every year. If a biological father has a criminal conviction, he can visit his child twice a year.
But why not just ban the biological father from visiting their children? Because the biological father is the person who brought the child into being, so it would be unfair to ban him from visiting for the sake of his child. Also, just because a biological father has a criminal conviction, he should not be able to visit his child twice a year. That’s just wrong. I mean, it’s not like it’s illegal to commit a crime.
The reasoning is that children are not human beings and therefore cannot be bound by the same rules that govern human beings. We know this principle is true because God doesn’t set out to punish an entire race of people just because they have a criminal record. He sets out to punish those of us who are the most culpable of all.
There are laws governing the naming of children and they are all about to be used to punish our children, if we dont want them to suffer the same fate as our father. The main reason for this is to prevent the children of rapists from being treated as criminals, but that only applies to the female rape victims. There is no reason to think that this law will apply to a male rape victim.
The law is about to be used on our children, our grandchildren, our great children. It is meant to punish us, to make us pay. It’s the ultimate form of punishment and I’m not sure it’s fair, so I think it’s probably a good thing that the law will be used now.
The child sex crimes act was introduced in India by the state in the 90s. The law dates back to ancient India, but was in effect since at least the 1930s. The act prohibits any child below 12 from being kept as a slave. The law is so strict that even if a child is not abused and is not a rapist, he or she can be jailed for up to 7 years.
The act was considered a loophole for child abusers, as the law did not require a child to be at least 12. Children under 12 are often kept in orphanages and are often abused. It’s not a perfect law, but it’s a law that most states have considered.
A couple of years ago the police started to question a single boy. A new police investigation was launched into a boy’s life after a mysterious crime was discovered. The boy’s father was arrested, and the boy was also charged with the crime. The boy is now in prison for a total of seven years. The boy’s mother is now in jail, and her son has been held in a foster home for six years.