Share This Article
This is a technique that I’ve been using quite a bit over the past few years. It is a technique in which you take a series of sequential steps and see how you can move toward the desired effect.
Basically, a derivative of the law of causality.
This technique is a bit of a hack because it is only applicable to sequential steps, but is otherwise quite effective.
As of right now, though, I don’t feel the need to use this technique because the effect I want is not one that I think will occur in the future. To me, the effect I want is to give people hope.
The effects I want are not just about the final outcome, they are also about what the future holds for them. If you want to change the future, do it. If you want to change the present, do it. If you want to change the present, do it. If you want to change the future, do it. If you want to change the present, do it.
I mean, I am not saying I want to alter the future. I’m saying that I want to change the present just as much. When I see someone get angry about the present, I want to change the present. When I see someone get angry about the future, I want to change it too. All of these things are about changing the present.
The law of derivation or the law of the future is Raoult’s law, an old French law of logic and logic-building. In 1543, Albert de la Tour d’Auvergne de la Ferté, a French mathematician, published a book of laws called “Lois contre les mœurs de l’exégèse” (“Rules against the Behavior of Exegesis”).
Raoult, or Raoul de la Tour was a French philosopher and logician, a student of Descartes, a pupil of Leibniz, and an early proponent of the method of the deductive method. In his book De la logique à l’esthétique, he argued that logic can be used to make sense of the world and that this can be achieved not only by reasoning but by means of inference.
Raoult’s law makes sense when applied to the case of two elements. For example, if we have two elements, say, a woman and a man, we can say that their relationship is this: A woman can walk into a man’s house if she has a car, and an individual can walk into a man’s house if she has a car. So if the husband and the wife have a car, and the woman has a car, then they can walk into the husband’s house.
This is what we want to do. After all, we don’t want to have to do a lot of things that we don’t want to do. We may have to do some more things that we don’t want to do, but it’s not too bad.