Share This Article
lis pendens is a Latin legal term that refers to the obligation of the owner of a piece of land to give up the right to occupy and occupy the land according to the rules of the land. In the past, people were required to give up ownership of their land, but that was the norm until the United States of America passed the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to the U.S. Constitutions in 1791.
The Fifth Amendment came about after the Civil War because the federal government was still trying to enforce the land ownership laws it passed. However, the original Fifth Amendment actually did two things. First, it said that “Congress shall make no law” that’s going to interfere with the ownership of a piece of land. It was the right of the individual to own land, but the right of the federal government to make the laws to protect the ownership of land.
The original Fifth Amendment was just that, a part of the Constitution. It really didn’t say anything about the ownership of land. In 1791, however, Congress passed a law making it illegal to transfer land to other people without the consent of the original owner. One of the rights of ownership in the original Constitution is the right to control one’s own property. Congress had no right to go around and make laws that interfered with that right.
But this law was repealed in 1868 with the passage of the Property Clause. Now there is no way Congress could have passed the Property Clause and passed the law that would have made it illegal for anyone to transfer land without the consent of the original owner, but it was passed anyway. This clause essentially says that in order to make a law you must first show that it is constitutional, and that was always the case.
This is one of those laws that’s so often overlooked that you’d think it was just a silly law, but it was actually repealed right before a major piece of legislation by being overruled by the Supreme Court. In the 1868 case of United States v. Mississippi, the Supreme Court ruled that there was no constitutional prohibition on states giving away land after it had been transferred to the state of the original owner.
That decision was based in part on the fact that the land had been sold at a time when selling land to the state was very much illegal, and the land was still a part of the original owner’s property. By this time, the land was owned by a different person, so the Supreme Court decided it was not a transfer of property.
What’s interesting about this case is that it’s not about “the transfer of property,” but rather “the giving of land.” So even though the Supreme Court’s ruling on the constitutionality of giving land away is based in part on the fact that states are allowed to give away land, the court doesn’t see this as a transfer. Instead, they see it more as a gift.
The court in a separate case decided that the same law that allows states to give away land also allows them to give away land that is not given away. This was the case of a person giving land to another person and a third person giving them a lease to the land. The court decided that the first two people, who had no interest in the land, could give the land to the third person, who had a personal interest in it.
This is an interesting case. The court was clearly split on the issue. A person gave away land to a third person and a third person gave it to a person. However, the third person had no personal interest in the land, so they could not give it to the first person. The court decided that the second, who had a personal interest in the land, could give the land to the third person.
lis pendens is an old term in English law for a contract that is signed by a person who has no personal interest in the contract, but who wishes to bind someone else. So if you own property and an old house, you can sign a contract that says that you will give it to someone else. This sounds like a great idea.