Share This Article
I think the easiest, most popular, but most important question that I ask is: “what is substantial question of law?” This is a question that has been asked for so long that the question itself is a little bit of a buzzword, and it is also one that is often asked by lawyers. It is the question that is asked when a judge is deciding whether a case has any legal merit.
In the case of the Supreme Court of Canada, it is one of the most difficult questions because it requires an exact definition of substantial question of law. An exact definition that a judge will use on the basis of the facts of the case, not on the basis of what a judge or judge proxy might think.
The main point of the question is that it is a question of legal merit. If you’re a firm lawyer, you can’t actually answer it if you don’t know the law. This is the main point that the question is about. If the judge asks it, you need to know the court case and the case itself. That’s why we’re asking this question.
Where does the question take root? As soon as you ask it you need to know what the law is. If youre a lawyer, you cant even answer the question. If youre a judge, you cant even answer the question.
We asked this question because we feel that the question itself is a form of self-awareness. If a question is about a legal question, then it must be about the law. So it is a question of legal merit. In other words, if you have a legal question, you must be aware of the law.
I think it is a good question. The law must be aware of its own self, and in order to fully understand and appreciate its own self it must be an expert. To make the law, we often have to ask the question, “What am i?” We then need to ask ourselves, “Am i a law?” (Asking the question we must determine whether the question is about law or about us.
The answer to this is “yes.” We are all law. But that doesn’t mean the law is self-aware. The law is not our own self.
The definition of law is as follows: “The law or the concept of law is established by the character of the object or its subject.” We can say the law is the law that is in front of us, and that is true as long as it is in front of us. If we have a law, we are not in front of it. We can say the law is self-aware if we have an opinion about it.
law is an opinion or judgment about reality. The law is not the reality that we are operating in. The law is not our own mind. The law is not our own person. The law is the concept in which we operate.
The law is the concept in which we operate, but it doesn’t matter if we are operating in reality or in our own mind. It doesn’t matter if the law we are operating in is of our own mind or of another person’s mind. The law is the concept in which we operate. We can’t be operating in reality or in our own mind. We can’t be operating in reality or in our own mind.